A Large Angry SCM [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
A Large Angry SCM [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
This demonstrates a problem with git-merge-base.
+# Setup for second test set
+#
+# PL PR
+# / \/ \
+# L2 C2 R2
+# | | |
+# L1 C1 R1
+# | | |
+# L0 C0 R0
+# \ | /
+# S
...
Not _that_ pathological in practice, given that you can't really
depend on the timestamps in a distributed SCM.
After I looked at the timestamps you assigned to these sequences
I fully agree they are not pathological at all. For each
"repository owner" who makes a single strand of pearls, time
seems to be flowing monotonically.
1 1
/ \/ \
4 -1 4
| | |
3 -2 3
| | |
2 -3 2
\ | /
0