On Tue, 30 May 2006, Martin Langhoff wrote:
There's been some discussion about repacking proactively without
preventing further work. But as Linus said, repacking on an active
repo is _safe_
Repacking is, but "-d" is not necessarily.
You really should do the prune-packed only _after_ you've repacked, and no
old git programs are around.
Some long-running (in git terms) git programs will look up the pack-files
when they start, and if you repack after that, they won't see the new
pack-file, but they _will_ notice that the unpacked files are no longer
there, and will be very unhappy indeed.
So the "-d" part really isn't necessarily safe.
Of course, in -practice- you won't likely see this, and the archive itself
is never corrupted, but concurrent git ops can fail due to it in theory,
and quite frankly, that's not the kind of SCM I like to use.
So either just do "git repack -a", or do things synchronously.
Linus