Re: [PATCH] git builtin "push"
From: Jeff Garzik <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:24
Linus Torvalds wrote:
If you want to push other branches, you need to do git push repo branch1 branch2 branch3 ... or git push --all repo where the latter does exactly what it says (use "--tags" instead of "--all" to just send all tags).
After experimenting, "--all" does indeed provide most of the features
that rsync provides. A few minor niggles:
1) Doesn't propagate local branch deletions to the remote, like rsync does.
2) git-push "-f" doesn't seem to work, but "--force" does.
3) You still have to provide a $repo argument to 'git pull $repo'.
Would like to list the default remote push URL in
.git/remotes/{somefile} so that I need only to do "git push --all" to
have changes send to any number of remote servers.
4) Propagation of alternatives is unclear (at least in docs). Without
my current pack file pre-sharing and hardlinking, I fear needlessly
uploading vanilla linux-2.6.git changes back to kernel.org, when I do a
push. Currently, pack files are downloaded _once_ from kernel.org to
local, and never re-uploaded.
Regards,
Jeff