Re: Following renames

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

No, it's the expected output just because you expected merges to always 
show up. Merges get ignored if any of the parents have the same content 
already.

Eek. Can I avoid that? What was the reason for choosing this behavior?

Perhaps rev-list --sparse?

No. "--sparse" still removes the uninteresting parents of merges. It just 
doesn't then make the linear history any denser.

		Linus