Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Shawn Pearce [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Unfortunately this change lead me down a path which changed the core
checkout code also used by apply and read-tree.
... which makes it much harder to swallow without careful
inspection X-<.
I think the patch only appears much bigger than it actually is,
because of reindentation effect coming from "if (to-temp-file)".
However, I am too tired to carefully examine them tonight, so I
hope you do not mind my postponing this for now.
Not at all. I read over the diff before sending it and thought it
made the patch look much worse than it really is, simply because
of the reindentation. :-|
Sometimes good 'ole diff ain't that great for conveying a change.
--
Shawn.