Re: [PATCH 3/3] Tie it all together: "git log"

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:

Anyway, apart from that issue (which I think should be trivial to sort out 
if we accept breaking --merge-order), the rest looks like it should just 
get more testing and handling of the few missing flags from rev-parse in 
revision.c, and it should be good.

I would say we should just rip merge-order out.  Who uses it,
and why does it not work with topo-order, again?