Re: [PATCH 5/5] Optionally work without python

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

In some setups (notably server setups) you do not need that dependency.
Gracefully handle the absence of python when NO_PYTHON is defined.

+ifdef NO_PYTHON
+	TEST_DEFS += NO_PYTHON=YesPlease
+endif

I wonder if there is a better way to do this.  All future
NO_BLAH that may affect tests need to have something like this
otherwise.

-default_strategies='recursive'
+if test -z "@@NO_PYTHON@@"; then
+	default_strategies='recursive'
+else
+	default_strategies='resolve'
+fi

Somebody commented on this part to make it shorter...

I'll take 2, 3, and 4 from this series for now.  They will
appear in "next".  Thanks.