Re: ***DONTUSE*** Re: [PATCH] Use a hashtable for objects instead of a sorted list

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

Could it be the shallow thing?

No, I do not think so.  In the current "master", "next", "pu"
picture, "pu" merges js/obj with the "8856cc69" commit and then
shallow and bind comes later.  That merged version is what I am
testing, and also its second parent, which is "master" plus
hashtable.  In either case, shallow and bind are not part of the
picture.

Again, sorry for the inconvenience, Junio.

That is not your fault, and I did not mean to sound I am unhappy
about *you*.  I am indeed unhappy because I did not see anything
obviously or subtly wrong with your patch after I moved call to
hashtable_index() in find_object().

But I think Linus nailed it.  I'll see if I can understand his
explanation.