Re: cg-update bug?

Dear diary, on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:03:59PM CET, I got a letter
where walt [off-list ref] said that...

walt wrote:

quoted

...there is no -v flag for cg-update.  Could it be added
so I can get the old behavior back?

Thanks for adding the flag, Petr.  I tried it on git and
the kernel this morning, and in each case cg-update -v
printed the name of only one file.  From looking at the
logs I'm pretty sure there were multiple files updated,
not just one.  Does it print all filenames for you?

It prints all the filenames for me, but only the fetched ones. If you
fetched without merge earlier, it will list only the newly fetched
stuff. That is rather confusing, so now I added also cg-merge -v and
cg-update will pass its -v to cg-merge instead of cg-fetch.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Of the 3 great composers Mozart tells us what it's like to be human,
Beethoven tells us what it's like to be Beethoven and Bach tells us
what it's like to be the universe.  -- Douglas Adams