Re: [PATCH 6/17] Document the [<head>...] and -- arguments to git-prune.
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:14
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Nikolai Weibull [off-list ref] writes:quoted
The documentation for git-prune was lacking descriptions of the head arguments and the -- option. +<head>...:: + The heads to look for unreachable objects in. This is + relative to $GIT_DIR (e.g., "HEAD", "refs/heads/master"). + When unspecified, all heads are updated to match the + remote repository.? updated to match???
Come to think of it, why would anybody want to pass heads explicitly? It seems to me that it would allow you to _lose_ objects referenced only from omitted branches...