Re: git-ls-tree: add "-t" option to always show the tree entries

Linus Torvalds <torvalds <at> osdl.org> writes:

That brings up another issue. I typed

	git-ls-tree -r --name-only ..

and it obviously didn't work.

This brings up another issue.  When git-ls-tree works from subdirectory,
do we want to see repository-relative paths, or cwd relative paths?
Currently we do the latter.