git-name-rev off-by-one bug · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · Petr Baudis <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · Petr Baudis <hidden> · 2016-06-15
as promised, docs: git for the confused · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: as promised, docs: git for the confused · Alan Chandler <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: as promised, docs: git for the confused · Petr Baudis <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: as promised, docs: git for the confused · Josef Weidendorfer <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · Daniel Barkalow <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug · Daniel Barkalow <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug

From: Daniel Barkalow <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:14

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:

*1* It is a shame that the most comprehensive definition of
3-way read-tree semantics is in t/t1000-read-tree-m-3way.sh test
script.

Isn't Documentation/technical/trivial-merge.txt more comprehensive?

Probably the tables in various other places should be replaced with 
references to this document.

	-Daniel

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help