Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Actually there is one.  If we are asked to do diff -1 and an
unmerged path does not have stage #2 but stage #1 entry exists,
we would end up showing that stage #1, without telling the user
that we are showing something different from what was asked.
How about doing something like this, on top of yours?

Yes.

		Linus