On Monday 07 November 2005 16:47, Nick Hengeveld wrote:

On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:43:19PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

 - http-push seems to still have a bug or two but that is to be
   expected for any new code, and I am reasonably sure it can be
   ironed out; preferably before 1.0 but it is not a
   showstopper.

It seems like a minor point, but is this the appropriate name or should
it be dav-push?  Not that there's anything else in the works AFAIK but
it's certainly possible that something else could run over HTTP later
on.

e.g. GIT encapsulated in SOAP

/me *ducks* and *runs*

Ingo Oeser