On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Martin Langhoff wrote:
quoted
git-core::
All the rest, plus man pages. We could separate out
commit walkers if we wanted to, but I do not think that
is necessary.
git-gitk ;-)
I really really prefer gitk in the core, even if it means that there's
that strange tcl/tk dependency.
It's very small, and having something that visualizes what git does for
people who don't understand git is _invaluable_.
It wouldn't have to be gitk, but that's the least pain right now. qgit
needs QT, which is much more contentious than tcl/tk.
Linus