Re: Errors from http-fetch
From: Daniel Barkalow <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:09
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Nick Hengeveld wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:46:10PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:quoted
I've now started getting errors from http-fetch; my guess for the output is that it has problems if an object is not available loose, and is only available in a pack file which is already being downloaded for a different object, possibly only if the first request to be made for the loose object is not the first one to fail.Are you getting a curl return code of 52/CURLE_GOT_NOTHING? Any chance you have access to the associated server logs?
I'm getting 404 for the object, which it reports. This was pulling from kernel.org.
In the situation you describe, fetch() won't be called for the second object until fetch() for the first object is finished - at which point the pack will have been fully downloaded for the first object (or failed, causing fetch() for the first object to fail as well.)
My theory is that you have: prefetch(#2), prefetch(#1), (other stuff), #1 gives an error, start downloading the pack, fetch(#2), #2 gives an error, and there are no more packs to try. That is, it was a later object that prompted getting the pack, because either the server decided to send that error message sooner, some packet got dropped and retransmitted, the connection got a lower-numbered file descriptor and they were ready at the same time, or something like that. Another thing I noticed was that it was in the middle of downloading the pack when it suddenly exitted due to not being able to find the object; it would probably be worth having a call to finish up the active transfers after giving up on completing the whole thing, since we probably do actually want to finish downloading a big pack if we've started. Consider the situation where you happen to catch the server in the middle of mirroring, and you're halfway through a big pack; restarting is nice, but it might as well let you finish downloading the pack, so you have less to do when you try again later. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*