Re: Confused as to the correct syntax

Alan Chandler [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Sorry, for not knowing how to do that properly in Asciidoc ;-).

The source to the man page and HTML page reads like this:

* A suffix '~<n>' to a revision parameter means the commit
  object that is the <n>th generation grand-parent of the named
  commit object, following only the first parent.  I.e. rev~3 is
  equivalent to rev^^^ which is equivalent to rev^1^1^1.

No the HTML page is screwed up too.

I know.  The source reads like above, is what I said.  Help from
Asciidoc savvy people is very welcomed.