Elfyn McBratney [off-list ref] writes:
which I'm guessing isn't expected behaviour ;) `git status` does the
same, FWIW.
Yes, I noticed 'git status' did it that some time ago, and I
thought "gee, that was ugly". But then I imagined what any
other realist maintainer would have said if I reported it as a
bug.
Lbh xabj lbh'ir whfg perngrq lbhe ercb naq vg vf rzcgl.
Jung qvq lbh rkcrpg sebz 'fgnghf' bhgchg? Jub pnerf! Naq
ubj bsgra jbhyq lbh rkcrpg gb eha 'tvg fgnghf' va n arjyl
perngrq ercbfvgbel sebz abj ba, abj lbh xabj jung lbh jbhyq
frr? Trg hfrq gb vg.
But I fixed it anyway, exactly a month ago.