Re: What shall we do with the GECOS field again?
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:06
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Does not appear to be. So I'd vote for us doing the "cut at first comma, substitute & with toupper(login[0])+login[1..]".
I've done this in the proposed updates branch.