Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: GIT - breaking backward compatibility

From: Brian Gerst <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:06

Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Brian Gerst wrote:
quoted
Essentially what I want to do is:

git-ls-files --others | xargs git-update-index --add --
git-ls-files --deleted | xargs git-update-index --remove --
git-ls-files --modified | xargs git-update-index --

This will completely resync the index and cache to the working tree 
state after applying a patch.

It will also be extremely inefficient.

If you really have a _patch_, then "git-apply --index" is what you want to 
apply it with. It applies a patch _and_ updates the index as appropriate. 
It's how git-applymbox can apply hundreds of patches in short order.

		Linus
That would be great, if git-apply accepted fuzzy patches.  I am trying 
to apply the -mm series patches, which often are slightly out of date. 
Andrew doesn't rebase them until they won't apply at all.

--
				Brian Gerst
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help