I'm not positive what the doc conventions are, but I think
something like this patch fixes the "superscript" problem
on the git-rev-list doc page.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <redacted>
---
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt b/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt
--- a/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ I have the commit object 'bar', but not
The *--bisect* flag limits output to the one commit object which is
roughly halfway between the included and excluded commits. Thus,
-if "git-rev-list --bisect foo ^bar ^baz" outputs 'midpoint', the output
-of "git-rev-list foo ^midpoint" and "git-rev-list midpoint ^bar ^baz"
+if 'git-rev-list --bisect foo ^bar ^baz' outputs 'midpoint', the output
+of 'git-rev-list foo ^midpoint' and 'git-rev-list midpoint ^bar ^baz'
would be of roughly the same length. Finding the change which introduces
a regression is thus reduced to a binary search: repeatedly generate and
test new 'midpoint's until the commit chain is of length one.