Re: [PATCH 00/22] cache cursors: an introduction

Daniel Barkalow [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

* It may make sense to give another param to describe which
  cache the caller is talking about so that we can later have
  more than one cache at the same time:

Wouldn't it be better to only take it in cc_init(), and have the cursor 
remember what it's iterating through?

Yes.

I'm actually particularly interested in having a pair of caches for 
read-tree, because it would actually like to keep the old index separate 
from the index it's building.

Yes.