Re: [RFC] Patches exchange is bad?

Marco Costalba [off-list ref] wrote:

I was thinking at two different kind of workflow, one were you are
tracking a remote repository ( Linux kernel project like ) and one
as single developer with both stable and develop lines ( qgit or
StGIT ;-) projects like ).

There is another option for the 2nd case, where you maintain both both
stable and development. You could use 'git push' to the stable
repository (actually, more like a mirror) and make the
StGIT-maintained repository track the changes from the stable one and
just update it with 'stg pull'

-- 
Catalin