Re: Switching heads and head vs branch after CVS import
From: Martin Langhoff <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:04
On 8/15/05, Matthias Urlichs [off-list ref] wrote:
Umm, actually, no, cvsimport doesn't do merges. Dunno where Martin got his from, but it wasn't me. ;-)
Just wishful thinking, and a viewing things on a remote box over a slow x11-over-ssh connection. When I think about it, it doesn't seem possible either, so I better stop dreaming.
quoted
Sven, Matthias, opinions? I've never used CVS keyword expansion, and always felt it was pointless, but hey..I have intentionally kept keyword expansion on when I wrote the code, because matching up the files from CVS with files gathered from tarballs, Debian repositories, and what-not, becomes a whole lot easier that way.
Makes sense in that context. On the other hand, if you are you're migrating a project from cvs to git, getting rid of the noise is good. And the resulting git repo will actually let you do trivial merges of old commits after you've switched -- otherwise every file-level merge will conflict, as it does in cvs when you don't use -kk. cheers, martin