Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: [PATCH] tagger id · Eric W. Biederman <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] tagger id

From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:02

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
I am afraid I do not follow you.  
I was confused.  My big problem was that we don't really have
an in tree user, and there wasn't a good explanation anywhere.  So it
was hard to track this down. 

I'm going to lobby for a script to import patches from email being
in the git tree just so people can see how this is done, and probably
because there are a lot of people who have been reinventing this
script :)
The intent of "tags" (especially the signed kind) is to express "trust":
"This commit is called v2.6.12 and *I* vouch for it."

COMMITTER is the only sensible thing to use there, because (as you said)
what you care is "who I am", not "for whom I am doing this"
Sounds good.

Eric
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help