Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Tags · Eric W. Biederman <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Tags · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Tags · Petr Baudis <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Tags · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Tags · Matthias Urlichs <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Tags · Petr Baudis <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Tags · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Tags · Daniel Barkalow <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: Tags · Petr Baudis <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: Tags

From: Daniel Barkalow <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:01

On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
You're missing the whole point of the discussion.  Right now the only 
thing that makes a global object store impossible is the potential for a 
tag conflict, either intentional or accidental.
Is there some issue remaining with having a global *object* store,
symlinked from multiple repositories, each with its own tags and
such? (I'd think that, in the refs, there would be more contention over
the heads than the tags, in any case; refs/heads/master is kind of
popular)

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help