Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: do people use the 'git' command?

From: Tommy M. McGuire <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:00

On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:02:20AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
But the real point of "git" wrapper is merely to present CVS and SVN
refugees the structure they are familiar with: a single command having
a set of subcommands.
CVS and SVN refugees (like me :-)) should probably be pointed to
porcelain.  Showing them a mixture of relatively unpolished "git
<subcommand>" and "git-*" commands is not likely to impress them with
the simplicity and elegance of the tool.  I don't think the surface
structure of "<command> <subcommand>" is an important factor, and
the first time they see a 40-hex-digit number, they'll be headed for the
hills.
Personally I think removal of "git" script is a bad idea.
I'd agree, for the opposite reason: the git script is a decent interface
for power users who don't want to use anything porcelainish.  It also
provides a good place to hang custom functionality.

-- 
Tommy McGuire
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help