Re: git-rev-list: proper lazy reachability

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

"LT" == Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:

LT> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:

quoted

Does this fix it for you (untested, of course)?

Will check later.

LT> Would people prefer to have "git-rev-list" take arguments like
LT> 	git-rev-list a b ^c ^d
LT> the way git-rev-tree does?

I do not expect myself to maintain many heads like Jeff, I
cannot comment on how well that "many heads" feature would work
in practice, but I would vote "a ^b" syntax to match
git-rev-tree.