Re: Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags

Dear diary, on Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 01:14:18AM CEST, I got a letter
where Radoslaw Szkodzinski [off-list ref] told me that...

Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:

quoted

Dan Holmsand wrote:

 

quoted

$ git-cat-file tag 06f6d9e2f140466eeb41e494e14167f90210f89d

which tells you that v2.6.12-rc5 is commit
2a24ab628aa7b190be32f63dfb6d96f3fb61580a

   

Ok.  This doesn't work too. That cogito version really works fine, but I
had that branch cloned from a local repository gotten from rsync and
probably that's the problem.
The tags weren't propagated, but they should be.

AstralStorm
 

Well, new cogito-0.11.1 (300ab153620d2492e824cb3561c32debb5e80bf8) has
this fixed and picked up missing objects automatically.

Oh yes, I wanted to mention it in this thread but forgot.

However note that what it does now is awful and it's just a
quick'n'dirty fix to make it mostly work. I guess a better way would be
to teach the pull tools to download refs/ files too and do the proper
dependency things from them too (in addition to the passed commit id).

I will need to go back and look again at the set of Daniel's patches
which implemented something like that.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor