Re: I want to release a "git-1.0"
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:41:59
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"DL" == David Lang [off-list ref] writes:
DL> Hmm, thinking out loud. would it help to look at the deltify scripts DL> and let them find the major chunks and then look in detail only when DL> that fails? It's unclear to me which part you are trying to help with deltify algorithm [*1*]. Internally, git-diff-cache -B -C is used which does use the deltify to locate complete rewrites, renames and copies (that's why the script is so slow). For passing on and assigning blames line by line, parsing "diff --unified=0" output was a lot easier for this script and that was what I did in this quick-and-dirty version. [Footnotes] *1* David says "deltify" and Nico calls it "deltafy". I am not a native speaker so I cannot tell, but which one is correct?