Re: I want to release a "git-1.0"

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:00:42PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

I think I'll move the "cvs2git" script thing to git proper before the 1.0 
release (again, in order to have the tutorial able to show what to do if 
you already have an existing CVS tree), what else?

Umm, why do you maintain two seperate "git" related trees?

Why not merge all of git-tools in, in a tools/ subdirectory?

I've been meaning to ask the same question about "gitweb" for that
matter.  The distributions that want seperate packages for dependency
reasons can handle that easily inside one tree, anyway, I believe.

I'd guess part of this is a holdover from the fact that you needed an
independent tree for BitKeeper, but does it still make sense?

-- 

Ryan Anderson
  sometimes Pug Majere