Re: [PATCH cogito] "cg-whatsnew" command

Petr Baudis [off-list ref] wrote:

Unfortunately I can't comment on it well when it's not either in the
body or as text/plain attachment.

It was attached as text/x-patch.

I think the -m usage doesn't make much sense now. What about dropping
branch1 and instead using what the user passed as the -r argument?

See attached (text/plain this time).

It is also possible not to give any argument to -m and use the -r ones
entirely (not implemented in the attached patch).

-- 
Catalin