Re: Rename tracking

Dear diary, on Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:05:30PM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] told me that...

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

"PB" == Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:

PB> I'll postpone it for another while since there is still some discussion
PB> about tuning the output.

What discussion did I miss???

Mainly

From: Petr Baudis <redacted>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:03:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Resurrect diff-tree-helper -R
Message-ID: [ref]

PB> I'm thinking about using "\n---\n\n" in commit message to separate some
PB> "internal data" like this. cg-log (and web interfaces and other
PB> toolkits, if we get to agree on something common) could then by default
PB> hide it. Below it would contain something which we could hopefully embed
PB> in patches too (actually less work for extracting patches by cg-mkpatch
PB> or similar tools). What do you think?

Since I have not been particularly interested in rename tracking
(because I myself personally have not felt the need for it), I
do not offhand have much idea worth to offer.  Sorry.

Well, I'd say that with those renaming patches we are feeling the need
for it?

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor