On 5/9/05, H. Peter Anvin [off-list ref] wrote:
What would be the point? The reason for bkcvs was that bk wasn't
available to everyone.
Ease of transition for other automated tasks, perhaps? I don't know
what bits and pieces of infrastructure hang from the old BK-CVS
changeset distribution infrastructure.
Some projects do count on CVS gateways even if they use smarter SCMs.
This is not just because of licensing issues -- sometimes portability
and preexisting tools trump SCM changes.
regards,
martin