Re: [PATCH 0/2] core-git documentation update

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

"DG" == David Greaves [off-list ref] writes:

DG> The intention now was for me to go through Linus' HEAD and verify the
DG> docs actually documented the HEAD.
DG> Then I think comparing the HEAD to jit-jc and preparing patches for that?

That one is up to you, but if your patches are against git-jc,
it would make _my_ life simpler and hopefully would make merge
easier for Linus when he returns.

After he returns, it would probably not make much sense sending
patch against git-jc, unless all of the following conditions
hold true: (1) what is already merged to git-jc conflicts with
what you are modifying, (2) all changes in git-jc are trivially
correct and veriy likely to hit Linus tree without being
rejected, and (3) Linus is too busy and lags behind git-jc.