Re: [PATCH] PPC assembly implementation of SHA1 · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH] PPC assembly implementation of SHA1 · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH] PPC assembly implementation of SHA1 · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH] PPC assembly implementation of SHA1 · Paul Mackerras <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH] PPC assembly implementation of SHA1 · Wayne Scott <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH] PPC assembly implementation of SHA1 · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Revised PPC assembly implementation · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · Paul Mackerras <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · Paul Mackerras <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · Paul Mackerras <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · Paul Mackerras <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: Revised PPC assembly implementation · <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] PPC assembly implementation of SHA1

From: <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:41:54

One bug I spotted too late: the first line of the STEPD2
macro still references %r15; that should be the new home of k, %r5.

Sorry about that.