> Using your suggested indexing method that uses [0:4] as the 1st level key and
[0:3]
> [4:8] as the 2nd level key, I obtain an indexed archive that occupies 159M,
> where the top level contains 18665 1st level keys, the largest first level dir
> contains 5 entries, and all 2nd level dirs contain exactly 1 entry.
That's just a mistake in the spec. The format should probably be
multi-level but, yes, the fanout I suggested is currently quite bogus.
When I write that part of that code (today or tomorrow) I'll fix it.
A few people pointed that out. Thanks.
-t