Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:09:06AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] told me that...
Yeah, yeah, it looks different from "cvs update", but dammit, wouldn't it
be cool to just write "cg-<tab><tab>" and see the command choices? Or
"cg-up<tab>" and get cg-update done for you..
I like this idea! :-) I guess that is in fact exactly what I have been
looking for, and (as probably apparent from the current git-pasky
structure) I prefer to have the scripts separated anyway.
I think I will go for it. I also thought about having this _and_ a 'cg'
command which would act as a completely dumb multiplexer, but I decided
to toss that idea since it would only create usage ambiguity and other
problems on the long run.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor