Re: [PATCH] write-tree performance problems
From: C. Scott Ananian <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:41:53
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Chris Mason wrote:
With the basic changes I described before, the 100 patch time only goes down to 40s. Certainly not fast enough to justify the changes. In this case, the bulk of the extra time comes from write-tree writing the index file, so I split write-tree.c up into libwrite-tree.c, and created update-cache --write-tree.
Hmm. Are our index files too large, or is there some other factor?
I was considering using a chunked representation for *all* files (not just
blobs), which would avoid the original 'trees must reference other trees
or they become too large' issue -- and maybe the performance issue you're
referring to, as well?
--scott
Boston MI6 quiche LPMEDLEY BLUEBIRD PBSUCCESS jihad biowarfare non-violent protest
Yakima NRA EZLN DES hack SARANAC KMPLEBE Echelon PBCABOOSE security
( http://cscott.net/ )