Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

From: Russell King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:41:53

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:09:42AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
quoted
Essentially, with BK, at 7am localtime each morning, I'd:

- update my baseline linux 2.6 tree
- for each working tree which may be pulled from
  - if the baseline is a superset
    - update working tree from baseline

The net result is that my workflow consisted entirely of:

1. commit whatever into working tree
2. test
3. send linus a pull request
4. repeat next day

The tree resynchronisation happened completely and entirely in the
background with no user intervention required at all.
And in the case of conflicts...?
If the baseline is a superset of the working tree, there will never be
any conflicts.  Note that as I said above, this is a condition on doing
the pull in the first place.

How we determine that with git is another matter though. 8)

-- 
Russell King
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help