Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 14 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Merge with git-pasky II.

From: C. Scott Ananian <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:41:52

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
given piece of content. Also because we actually have the developer's
attention at commit time, and we can get _real_ answers from the user
about what she was doing, instead of having to guess.
Yes, but it's still hard to get *accurate* information.  And developers 
tend to use very short commit messages already...
But if it can be done cheaply enough at a later date even though we end
up repeating ourselves, and if it can be done _well_ enough that we
shouldn't have just asked the user in the first place, then yes, OK I
agree.
I think examining the rsync algorithms should convince you that finding 
common chunks can be fairly efficient.  (See my next message for a more 
concrete proposal.)
  --scott

Rijndael AMLASH Moscow Ft. Bragg shotgun HTKEEPER SHERWOOD overthrow 
Uzi anthrax Yeltsin Indonesia Suharto LITEMPO Dictionary Yakima KUBARK
                          ( http://cscott.net/ )
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help