Re: linux-next: unneeded merge in the security tree

From
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date
2013-03-13 02:30:34
Also in
linux-next, lkml
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:30:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Theodore Ts'o [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
[remote "origin"]
	url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
	fetch = +refs/heads/master:refs/heads/master
	mergeoptions = --ff-only
Is there an escape hatch for that rare case?  IOW, how does a
submaintainer who configured the above to override --ff-only?
Hmm, maybe we would need to add a --no-ff-only?  Or they could just
do:

	git fetch origin
	git merge FETCH_HEAD

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:28:39PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Of course, I'm not really sure if we want to list the flags. Maybe
it's better to just introduce the notion of "upstream" directly, and
make that a flag, and make "origin" default to that when you clone.
And then have git use different heurstics for pulling upstream (like
warning by default when doing a back-merge, perhaps?)
What if git automaticallly set up the origin branch to have a certain
set of mergeoptions by default?  That would probably be right for most
users, but it makes it obvious what's going on when they take a look
at the .git/config file, and doesn't make the remote that happens to
have the name "origin" as having certain magic properties.  Using a
set of mergeoptions would also be bit more general, and might have
applications in the future.

     	      	       	  	 	       - Ted
Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, last reply 2013-03-13
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help