Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2012-03-12

Re: stripping [PATCH] without losing later tags from mailed patches (Re: [ 02/12] Remove COMPAT_IA32 support)

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: 2012-03-12 19:17:46
Also in: lkml, stable

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:54:40PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
quoted
From my user experience and what I see on a number of coworkers, users
tend to make big jumps when they need a new feature, so in practice,
not offering the option in a version or two would probably not affect
most users, especially the ones still relying on the old behaviour. So
I don't see much benefit in waiting for repurposing the option.
The benefit is that if it does turn out to be a regression, early
adopters will complain to us because their scripts have stopped
working and we get a chance to back out the change without having to
worry about others who have started to rely on the option.
Indeed you're right. I forgot the case of the old script relying
on the silently ignored parameter!

Regards,
Willy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help