On 4/15/08, David Newall [off-list ref] wrote:

James Morris wrote:
 > I don't know how to solve this, but suspect that encouraging the use of
 > reviewed-by and also including it in things like analysis of who is
 > contributing, selection for kernel summit invitations etc. would be a
 > start.  At least, better than nothing.

Would it be hard to keep count of the number of errors introduced by
 author and reviewer?

I've found quite a few errors in kernel-userland APIs, but I'm not
sure that this sort of negative statistic would be helpful -- e.g.,
more productive developers probably also introduce more errors.

-- 
I'll likely only see replies if they are CCed to mtk.manpages at gmail dot com