Thread (92 messages) 92 messages, 29 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers

From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <hidden>
Date: 2005-06-24 13:53:28
Also in: lkml

2005/6/24, Theodore Ts'o [off-list ref]:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 03:06:04PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:41:01AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
quoted
Cool. Except where the concepts are just different, Cogito mostly
appears at least equally simple to use as Mercurial. Yes, some features
are missing yet. I hope to fix that soon. :-)
The user interface and network protocol isn't the big deal, the big deal
is the more efficient on-disk storage format IMHO.
E2fsprogs with the full revision history imported into git is 100
megs, and that's with deltas.  E2fsprogs imported into Mercurial is 17
megs (and actually, the imported repository was just a tad bit smaller
than e2fsprogs' BK repository).

Which do you think is going to be faster to operate from a cold start
using 4200 rpm laptop drives?  :-)

                                               - Ted
That's quite intersting, what the rational behind such a difference in
terms of disk occupation ?

-- 
Paolo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help