Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] common: add zoned block device checks
From: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>
Date: 2021-08-16 06:07:38
Also in:
linux-btrfs
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 10:42:46PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:12:29AM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:quoted
dm-error and dm-snapshot does not have DM_TARGET_ZONED_HM nor DM_TARGET_MIXED_ZONED_MODEL feature and does not implement .report_zones(). So, it cannot pass the zone information from the down layer (zoned device) to the upper layer. Loop device also cannot pass the zone information. This patch requires non-zoned block device for the tests using these ones. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> --- common/dmerror | 3 +++ common/dmhugedisk | 3 +++ common/rc | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)diff --git a/common/dmerror b/common/dmerror index 01a4c8b5e52d..64ee78d85b95 100644 --- a/common/dmerror +++ b/common/dmerror@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ _dmerror_setup() export DMLINEAR_TABLE="0 $blk_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev 0" export DMERROR_TABLE="0 $blk_dev_size error $dm_backing_dev 0" + + # dm-error cannot handle zone information + _require_non_zoned_device "${dm_backing_dev}"We should really do the check in _require rules not in _setup() functions. Please see below.quoted
} _dmerror_init()diff --git a/common/dmhugedisk b/common/dmhugedisk index 502f0243772d..715f95efde29 100644 --- a/common/dmhugedisk +++ b/common/dmhugedisk@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ _dmhugedisk_init() local dm_backing_dev=$SCRATCH_DEV local chunk_size="$2" + # We cannot ensure sequential writes on the backing device + _require_non_zoned_device $dm_backing_dev + if [ -z "$chunk_size" ]; then chunk_size=512 fidiff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc index 7b80820ff680..03b7e0310a84 100644 --- a/common/rc +++ b/common/rc@@ -1837,6 +1837,9 @@ _require_loop() else _notrun "This test requires loopback device support" fi + + # loop device does not handle zone information + _require_non_zoned_device ${TEST_DEV} } # this test requires kernel support for a secondary filesystem@@ -1966,6 +1969,10 @@ _require_dm_target() if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then _notrun "This test requires dm $target support" fi + + if [ $target = thin-pool ]; then + _require_non_zoned_device ${SCRATCH_DEV} + fiI think we could move all check here, based on $target, e.g. case $target in thin-pool|error|snapshot) _require_non_zoned_device ${SCRATCH_DEV} ;; esac
I see. It looks far better. I'll do so.
Thanks, Eryuquoted
} _zone_type() -- 2.32.0