On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:18:18PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:47:53AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

quoted

Instead of the loop to check if the attr existed can't we just check
for the ENODATA return value from removexattr?

Yes.

No -- attr_remove_f reads the list of attribute names from the file and
then picks one at random to lremovexattr().

--D

quoted

Also I think with this series we can drop the libattr dependency
for xfstests, can't we?

I'll do that in a subsequent patch.

--D