Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eventdev: negate maintenance capability flag
From: Mattias Rönnblom <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-10 10:07:36
On 2021-11-10 10:55, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Mattias Rönnblom <redacted> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 9:29 AM To: jerinj@marvell.com; Jerin Jacob <redacted>; Sunil Kumar Kori [off-list ref] Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <redacted>; Hemant Agrawal [off-list ref]; Nipun Gupta [off-list ref]; Van Haaren, Harry [off-list ref]; Thomas Monjalon [off-list ref]; David Marchand [off-list ref]; Gujjar, Abhinandan S [off-list ref]; Carrillo, Erik G [off-list ref]; Jayatheerthan, Jay [off-list ref]; Yigit, Ferruh [off-list ref]; Akhil Goyal [off-list ref]; mattias.ronnblom [off-list ref] Subject: [PATCH] eventdev: negate maintenance capability flag Replace RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_REQUIRES_MAINT, which signaled the need for the application to call rte_event_maintain(), with RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_MAINTENANCE_FREE, which does the opposite (i.e., signifies that the event device does not require maintenance). This approach is more in line with how other eventdev hardware and/or software limitations are handled in the Eventdev API. Signed-off-by: Mattias Rönnblom <redacted>Generally patch looks fine to me, but on testing I got a strange warning from the compiler on the OPDL driver: In file included from ../drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.h:8, from ../drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:15: ../drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c: In function ‘opdl_info_get’: ../lib/eventdev/rte_eventdev.h:302:44: warning: conversion from ‘long long unsigned int’ to ‘un signed char’ changes value from ‘1024’ to ‘0’ [-Woverflow] 302 | #define RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_MAINTENANCE_FREE (1ULL << 10) | ^ ../drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:379:34: note: in expansion of macro ‘RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_MAINT ENANCE_FREE’ 379 | RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_MAINTENANCE_FREE, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Investigating, RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_* are assigned to struct rte_event_dev_info::event_dev_cap, which is a uint32_t. The error suggests that the variable being assigned to is a "unsigned char"? <snip>quoted
static voiddiff --git a/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c b/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c index 5007e9a7bf..787ee4713d 100644 --- a/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c +++ b/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c@@ -376,6 +376,7 @@ opdl_info_get(struct rte_eventdev *dev, structrte_event_dev_info *info) .max_num_events = OPDL_INFLIGHT_EVENTS_TOTAL, .event_dev_cap = RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_BURST_MODE | RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_CARRY_FLOW_ID, + RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_MAINTENANCE_FREE, };Aha! Replace:quoted
RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_CARRY_FLOW_ID,with:quoted
RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_CARRY_FLOW_ID |The "," character was causing the _FREE flag to not be combined with the previous flags field, instead being its own (unnamed?) assignment to the struct rte_event_dev_info. With that , to | change, all looks good to me. -Harry
I sent a v2. Thanks!