Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] mbuf: avoid cast-align warning in pktmbuf mtod offset macro
From: Olivier Matz <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-19 09:47:07
Hi Eli, On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:41:56AM +0300, Eli Britstein wrote:
Hi Olivier, On 8/1/2021 11:06 AM, Eli Britstein wrote:quoted
On 7/30/2021 2:10 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:quoted
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Hi Eli, On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:13:45AM +0300, Eli Britstein wrote:quoted
On 7/28/2021 6:28 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:quoted
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 09:49:09AM +0300, Eli Britstein wrote:quoted
In rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset macro, there is a casting from char * to type 't', which may cause cast-align warning when using gcc flags '-Werror -Wcast-align': .../include/rte_mbuf_core.h:723:3: error: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Werror=cast-align] 723 | ((t)((char *)(m)->buf_addr + (m)->data_off + (o))) | ^ As the code assumes correct alignment, add first a (void *) casting, to avoid the warning. Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein <redacted>My initial thinking was that it's the problem of the application: if -Werror=cast-align is used, it is up to the application to cast the return value of rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset() to (void *) before casting it to the network type. But, if I understand correctly, the problem is not about the application code itself, but about inlined code in the header files of dpdk (i.e. compiling an empty C file that just includes the dpdk headers with -Werror=cast-align). Is it correct? If yes I think it should be highlighted in the commit log.I think yes, though in this specific patch it is not even an inline function, but a macro. However, I don't have a synthetic application example to show those warnings, thus didn't put such in the commit msg.For this patch, I think it would be useful to have a way to reproduce the issue first, so we can check whether it is the proper place to fix the problem.--- a/examples/l2fwd/Makefile +++ b/examples/l2fwd/Makefile@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static: build/$(APP)-staticln -sf $(APP)-static build/$(APP) PC_FILE := $(shell $(PKGCONF) --path libdpdk 2>/dev/null) +CFLAGS += -Wcast-align=strict CFLAGS += -O3 $(shell $(PKGCONF) --cflags libdpdk) gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-10ubuntu2) 9.3.0 Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. make -C examples/l2fwd clean staticTo reproduce locally with DPDK only, no need to change any file. Only run: CFLAGS="-Wcast-align=strict" make V=1 -C examples/l2fwd clean static How would you like to proceed?
Sorry, I missed your previous message. I reproduced the issue, with
a slightly modified command:
# no error, my gcc is 8.3.0-6 (debian)
CFLAGS="-Wcast-align=strict" make V=1 -C examples/l2fwd clean static
# bad option name with clang
CC=clang CFLAGS="-Wcast-align=strict" make V=1 -C examples/l2fwd clean static
...
warning: unknown warning option '-Wcast-align=strict'; did you mean '-Wcast-align'? [-Wunknown-warning-option]
# problem reproduced with clang
CC=clang CFLAGS="-Wcast-align" make V=1 -C examples/l2fwd clean static
main.c:170:8: warning: cast from 'char *' to 'struct rte_ether_hdr *' increases required alignment from 1 to 2 [-Wcast-align]
eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(m, struct rte_ether_hdr *);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/include/rte_mbuf_core.h:830:32: note: expanded from macro 'rte_pktmbuf_mtod'
#define rte_pktmbuf_mtod(m, t) rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, t, 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/include/rte_mbuf_core.h:816:3: note: expanded from macro 'rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset'
((t)((char *)(m)->buf_addr + (m)->data_off + (o)))
I confirm the patch fixes the issue.
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <redacted>
Thanks