Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] mempool: implement index-based per core cache
From: Ananyev, Konstantin <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-02 18:51:48
quoted
quoted
Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace it with index-based implementation, where in each buffer is addressed by (pool address + index)I don't think it is going to work: On 64-bit systems difference between pool address and it's elem address could be bigger than 4GB.Are you talking about a case where the memory pool size is more than 4GB?
That is one possible scenario. Another possibility - user populates mempool himself with some external memory by calling rte_mempool_populate_iova() directly. I suppose such situation can even occur even with normal rte_mempool_create(), though it should be a really rare one.
quoted
quoted
It will reduce memory requirements L3Fwd performance testing reveals minor improvements in the cache performance and no change in throughput Micro-benchmarking the patch using mempool_perf_test shows significant improvement with majority of the test cases Future plan involves replacing global pool's pointer-based implementation with index-based implementation Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <redacted> --- drivers/mempool/ring/rte_mempool_ring.c | 2 +- lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c | 8 +++ lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mempool/ring/rte_mempool_ring.cb/drivers/mempool/ring/rte_mempool_ring.c index b1f09ff28f4d..e55913e47f21 100644--- a/drivers/mempool/ring/rte_mempool_ring.c +++ b/drivers/mempool/ring/rte_mempool_ring.c@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ ring_alloc(struct rte_mempool *mp, uint32_trg_flags)quoted
return -rte_errno; mp->pool_data = r; - + mp->local_cache_base_addr = &r[1]; return 0; }diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c index 59a588425bd6..424bdb19c323 100644 --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c@@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ rte_mempool_populate_default(structrte_mempool *mp)quoted
int ret; bool need_iova_contig_obj; size_t max_alloc_size = SIZE_MAX; + unsigned lcore_id; ret = mempool_ops_alloc_once(mp); if (ret != 0)@@ -600,6 +601,13 @@ rte_mempool_populate_default(structrte_mempool *mp)quoted
} } + /* Init all default caches. */ + if (mp->cache_size != 0) { + for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++) + mp->local_cache[lcore_id].local_cache_base_value = + *(void **)mp->local_cache_base_addr; + } + rte_mempool_trace_populate_default(mp); return mp->size;diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h index 4235d6f0bf2b..545405c0d3ce 100644 --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ #include <rte_memcpy.h> #include <rte_common.h> +#include <arm_neon.h> + #include "rte_mempool_trace_fp.h" #ifdef __cplusplus@@ -91,11 +93,12 @@ struct rte_mempool_cache { uint32_t size; /**< Size of the cache */ uint32_t flushthresh; /**< Threshold before we flush excess elements*/quoted
uint32_t len; /**< Current cache count */ + void *local_cache_base_value; /**< Base value to calculate indices +*/ /* * Cache is allocated to this size to allow it to overflow in certain * cases to avoid needless emptying of cache. */ - void *objs[RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE * 3]; /**< Cacheobjects */quoted
+ uint32_t objs[RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE * 3]; /**< Cacheobjects */quoted
} __rte_cache_aligned; /**@@ -172,7 +175,6 @@ struct rte_mempool_objtlr { * A list of memory where objects are stored */ STAILQ_HEAD(rte_mempool_memhdr_list, rte_mempool_memhdr); - /** * Callback used to free a memory chunk */@@ -244,6 +246,7 @@ struct rte_mempool { int32_t ops_index; struct rte_mempool_cache *local_cache; /**< Per-lcore local cache */ + void *local_cache_base_addr; /**< Reference to the base value */ uint32_t populated_size; /**< Number of populated objects. */ struct rte_mempool_objhdr_list elt_list; /**< List of objects inpool */ @@ -1269,7 +1272,15 @@ rte_mempool_cache_flush(structrte_mempool_cache *cache,quoted
if (cache == NULL || cache->len == 0) return; rte_mempool_trace_cache_flush(cache, mp); - rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, cache->objs, cache->len); + + unsigned int i; + unsigned int cache_len = cache->len; + void *obj_table[RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE * 3]; + void *base_value = cache->local_cache_base_value; + uint32_t *cache_objs = cache->objs; + for (i = 0; i < cache_len; i++) + obj_table[i] = (void *) RTE_PTR_ADD(base_value,cache_objs[i]);quoted
+ rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, obj_table, cache->len); cache->len = 0; }@@ -1289,7 +1300,9 @@ static __rte_always_inline void__mempool_generic_put(struct rte_mempool *mp, void * const *obj_table, unsigned int n, struct rte_mempool_cache *cache) { - void **cache_objs; + uint32_t *cache_objs; + void *base_value; + uint32_t i; /* increment stat now, adding in mempool always success */ __MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, put_bulk, 1); @@ -1301,6 +1314,12@@quoted
__mempool_generic_put(struct rte_mempool *mp, void * const *obj_table, cache_objs = &cache->objs[cache->len]; + base_value = cache->local_cache_base_value; + + uint64x2_t v_obj_table; + uint64x2_t v_base_value = vdupq_n_u64((uint64_t)base_value); + uint32x2_t v_cache_objs; + /* * The cache follows the following algorithm * 1. Add the objects to the cache@@ -1309,12 +1328,26 @@ __mempool_generic_put(struct rte_mempool*mp, void * const *obj_table,quoted
*/ /* Add elements back into the cache */ - rte_memcpy(&cache_objs[0], obj_table, sizeof(void *) * n); + +#if defined __ARM_NEON + for (i = 0; i < (n & ~0x1); i+=2) { + v_obj_table = vld1q_u64((const uint64_t *)&obj_table[i]); + v_cache_objs = vqmovn_u64(vsubq_u64(v_obj_table,v_base_value));quoted
+ vst1_u32(cache_objs + i, v_cache_objs); + } + if (n & 0x1) { + cache_objs[i] = (uint32_t) RTE_PTR_DIFF(obj_table[i],base_value);quoted
+ } +#else + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { + cache_objs[i] = (uint32_t) RTE_PTR_DIFF(obj_table[i],base_value);quoted
+ } +#endif cache->len += n; if (cache->len >= cache->flushthresh) { - rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, &cache->objs[cache- size], + rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, obj_table + cache->len-quoted
+cache->size, cache->len - cache->size); cache->len = cache->size; }@@ -1415,23 +1448,26 @@ __mempool_generic_get(struct rte_mempool*mp, void **obj_table,quoted
unsigned int n, struct rte_mempool_cache *cache) { int ret; + uint32_t i; uint32_t index, len; - void **cache_objs; + uint32_t *cache_objs; /* No cache provided or cannot be satisfied from cache */ if (unlikely(cache == NULL || n >= cache->size)) goto ring_dequeue; + void *base_value = cache->local_cache_base_value; cache_objs = cache->objs; /* Can this be satisfied from the cache? */ if (cache->len < n) { /* No. Backfill the cache first, and then fill from it */ uint32_t req = n + (cache->size - cache->len); + void *temp_objs[RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE * 3];/**< Cache objectsquoted
+*/ /* How many do we require i.e. number to fill the cache + therequest */quoted
ret = rte_mempool_ops_dequeue_bulk(mp, - &cache->objs[cache->len], req); + temp_objs, req); if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { /* * In the off chance that we are buffer constrained,@@ -1442,12quoted
+1478,32 @@ __mempool_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void**obj_table,quoted
goto ring_dequeue; } + len = cache->len; + for (i = 0; i < req; ++i, ++len) { + cache_objs[len] = (uint32_t)RTE_PTR_DIFF(temp_objs[i], base_value);quoted
+ } + cache->len += req; } + uint64x2_t v_obj_table; + uint64x2_t v_cache_objs; + uint64x2_t v_base_value = vdupq_n_u64((uint64_t)base_value); + /* Now fill in the response ... */ +#if defined __ARM_NEON + for (index = 0, len = cache->len - 1; index < (n & ~0x1); index+=2, + len-=2, obj_table+=2) { + v_cache_objs = vmovl_u32(vld1_u32(cache_objs + len - 1)); + v_obj_table = vaddq_u64(v_cache_objs, v_base_value); + vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)obj_table, v_obj_table); + } + if (n & 0x1) + *obj_table = (void *) RTE_PTR_ADD(base_value,cache_objs[len]);quoted
+#else for (index = 0, len = cache->len - 1; index < n; ++index, len--,obj_table++)quoted
- *obj_table = cache_objs[len]; + *obj_table = (void *) RTE_PTR_ADD(base_value,cache_objs[len]);quoted
+#endif cache->len -= n; -- 2.17.1